HomeFactopediaBrainoffsRankingsCommunityLog In
You know 0 facts





Fri 11 Nov 16 #1 
jmaxg
Contributor


Let's discuss it now after the fact.

Where they were, why they were there and what was in them.

Let's see if the Trump favourers wish to show up and discuss.

We KNOW that the whole email question was a crock of bull.

I'd just like to know from the opposition, if they are brave enough, what it was about Hillary Clinton that was so untrustworthy.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Fri 11 Nov 16 #2 
jmaxg
Contributor

The fact is that NONE of the emails sent or received, whether on her from her server or not, State Department or not, could be regarded as matters of national security.

Of the 110 emails finally regarded, only THREE were thought to be possibly classified as "confidential" and those three were because of references to phone calls and no content of those calls were recorded whatsoever. Close enough to a mistake as anything else, if that.

If people voted against her because they felt she was "untrustworthy", then I am sorry, but you have to back that up.

If it's because of a "feeling", then you may have commited the biggest fraud in United States history.

 




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Fri 11 Nov 16 #3 
jmaxg
Contributor

I'm waiting people......explain the whole "email" thing to me in your own words.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Fri 11 Nov 16 #4 
jmaxg
Contributor

I am predicting that nobody will show up because they are cowards and are not willing to discuss the technicality that put a BOOB in the Oval Office.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message
1 person likes this post


Fri 11 Nov 16 #5 
jmaxg
Contributor

Michael Moore can say the the "rust belt" of America were ignored up the whazoo.

What he doesn't say is if they had access to the internet and could have made up their own minds for themselves.

There is a difference between being lazy or being an informed voter.

I contend that a lot of American voters on November 8th 2016 were just plain lazy.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Fri 11 Nov 16 #6 
jmaxg
Contributor

Assuming Hillary Clinton lied all the time is factually incorrect.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Fri 11 Nov 16 #7 
kevg
The Grumpinator

Not a Trump supporter but quite happy to row anytime. Right wing obviously which is why I get in so much trouble with left wing idiots who run his site.

Emails are a load of b******s, similar to Trump molesting women, just a stick to use to hit people with. This is how low politics as become.




Knows 39428 facts
like | send message


Fri 11 Nov 16 #8 
chooky
Contributor

Very low, indeed!
I guess that's why I'm wondering if the White House will develop a new protocol to greet visiting dignitaries Perhaps the President will grasp the men firmly by the hand & the women warmly by the crotch.




Knows 160196 facts
like | send message
4 people like this post


Sun 13 Nov 16 #9 
jmaxg
Contributor

But he did molest women! He said it! It's on tape!

Sorry kevg, but I don't get how you say that Trump's molesting of women is bull if it's on tape.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message
1 person likes this post


Sun 13 Nov 16 #10 
jmaxg
Contributor

I can post the link again if need be.

I am sure that ALL of us can.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Sun 13 Nov 16 #11 
jmaxg
Contributor

BUT in any case, don't be detracted.

This is about the Hillary's emails. I am asking an honest question.

Please tell me what made you believe that Hillary Clinton lied!

I know everything about her emails after spending much of my time researching it.

But the point is, I need to know the opposing view...........what was it about her emails, specifically, that turned you off?




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Sun 13 Nov 16 #12 
jmaxg
Contributor

As for the actual question, in July of 2016, FBI director James Comey did a weird thing. He held a press conference in which he not only stated there will be no further action, he seemed to editorialise that he was unhappy. But, the FBI found nothing.

The next day, in front of a Senate Committee, he changed his previous day's statement to include 110 emails that MAY be classified, but after cross questioning, FBI Director Comey admitted that three emails where under scrutiny because they were phone calls to classified personnel.....and therefore had a [C] at the front and back of the reference of them. THAT'S IT!

And that had to be dragged out of Director Comey who was acting perilously close to being in Contempt of Congress.

Notwithstanding the later letter that possibly killed Hillary Clinton's chances, can one detect a pattern here?

President Obama, whilst not regretting his decision to appoint Director Comey, a known Republican, has expressed a lack of confidence in the director.

Did the RNC somehow and subversively communicate with and direct FBI Director Comey and issue instructions? That is entirely possible.

Mind you, that's a theory..........but very warranted.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Sun 13 Nov 16 #13 
jmaxg
Contributor

Bill Maher said recently that DNC and democratic leaders need to get down in the gutter and be tough.

I'm, not saying you're wrong Bill. But Elizabeth Warren has always been there.

That lady is fearless.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Tue 15 Nov 16 #14 
jmaxg
Contributor

Guys.....why were the emails illegal?

Nobody is answering the question.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Tue 15 Nov 16 #15 
kevg
The Grumpinator

Emails themselves probably weren't illegal but a good stick to hit her with. She was lax letting them be seen by others. Same as Trump's "molesting", it is all fair in war and politics until you lose, then you start whining.

 




Knows 39428 facts
like | send message


Tue 15 Nov 16 #16 
chooky
Contributor

Unless your name is Donald Trump in which case you start whining when the contest has barely begun,




Knows 160196 facts
like | send message
2 people like this post


Thu 17 Nov 16 #17 
jmaxg
Contributor

"She was lax letting them be seen by others"

What does that even mean? NOBODY want's their emails to be "seen by others" except for the intended addressee.

But for some reason, any email marked "H", OR chain of emails where "H" just happened to be one of the addressees.....

The next extent is, Hillary Clinton somehow broke the law.

I'm still waiting........exactly how did she do that?




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Fri 18 Nov 16 #18 
jmaxg
Contributor

Well, she didn't. It's as simple as that.

To watch people's posts in social media making her out to be some kind of crook is embarrassing.

You are supposed to have actually committed a crime to be called a criminal.

Why is Hillary Clinton somehow exempt from that condition?




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Sat 19 Nov 16 #19 
Helen McKenzie
Contributor

She is exempt because she is not a criminal!




Knows 22791 facts
like | send message


Tue 22 Nov 16 #20 
jmaxg
Contributor

I guess they aren't gonna take the bait.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Tue 22 Nov 16 #21 
chooky
Contributor

It's possible that some are beginning see the light & so now they're too busy praying.




Knows 160196 facts
like | send message
1 person likes this post


Sat 26 Nov 16 #22 
jmaxg
Contributor

I am disappointed with the Hillary Clinton campaign team to a degree.

But at the same time, knowing how to align one-self with "deplorables" might be the breaking point.

ANYBODY that keeps waving that damn confederate flag in my face is going to lose my vote.

The very POINT of that flag makes me throw up a little into my own mouth.

Don't stop struggling.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


Sat 26 Nov 16 #23 
jmaxg
Contributor

As for people too busy preying?

It's your choice.




Knows 33692 facts
like | send message


This topic is now closed.






   About - Terms - Privacy Log In